benstrong26 Thank you for expressing your beliefs.
benstrong26 said:
The government already mandates you do things in the name of safety. You have to wear a seat belt when you drive. How come you aren't in arms over that? I'd argue seat belts are an even more egregious violation of your rights, as they only protect you and masks are worn to protect others from you so at least their is a public safety argument to be made.
I'm against the government mandating me to wear a seatbelt. I'm in arms over that as well. I'm against any form of government coercion. If I choose to not wear a seatbelt and die as a result, then that was my choice - the government shouldn't be able to dictate what I do in the safety of my own car.
benstrong26 said:
masks are worn to protect others from you so at least their is a public safety argument to be made.
I don't agree that masks are there for a public safety reason - I think they are there to make it seem as if government is doing something about Corona, when the reality is everyone will eventually get it.
benstrong26 said:
Also I don't understand the motive the government would have to implement these measures if they weren't necessary. Last I checked voting rights weren't curbed and that's how we decide our leaders. What benefit would the government get from forcing people into lockdown? It completely kills the economy, hurts their bottom line, and makes them unpopular. Even a fascist government wouldn't want to kill their economy, it makes no sense.
The motive is to make it seem as if they are doing something positive, when the reality is they are infringing upon their citizen's rights.
At first, no one knew how deadly the virus was, so everyone was panicking and there was a hysteria of fear. Due to this, lockdown were instituted. A good example of a fascist government that does want to kill their economy is Australia (especially the part where Andy is living in). Almost no deaths, but complete government shutdown. A fascist government doesn't care about the economy - the only thing it cares about is if it has control of its citizens.
Which political party would benefit the most from an economic downturn in the next election? Of course the Democrats.
benstrong26 said:
The current IFR estimate from the CDC is 0.65% https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... arios.html.
Do you really trust the CDC? Didn't they say that the death rate was like 2 % first? Now it's .6 %? Keeps going down and down... So much for a trustworthy organization.
If I had to guess the death rate is 5-10x even less than that.
benstrong26 said:
The worse flu seasons kill 60,000 people in the US and COVID-19 has killed 154,000 already.
Coronavirus has not killed 154,000 in US. This is a compete falsehood. That is a statistic fed to you by the radical left.
This statistic encompasses people who have died with Covid, it does not encompass how many people have died because of Covid. If i was a drunk driver, rammed into a pole, and was taken to the hospital, tested positive for Covid, then I would be considered a part of this statistic. This statistic is vastly inflated so hospitals can make money.
benstrong26 said:
I'm not sure where you got this from. Researchers have done simulations on what would happen if the population wore masks. In one simulation, 80% wearing masks did more to reduce COVID-19 transmission than a strict lockdown (w/o masks) did. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/06/41790 ... ks-prevent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRa6t_e7dgI
Spoken from Fauci himself: "People should not be walking around with masks."
Studies that show face masks don't work:
Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002
N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.
bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”
Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016 https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
“We identified six clinical studies … . In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”
Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017, Pages 1934–1942, https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant”; as per Fig. 2c therein:
Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
“Among 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons. ... Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1- 9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
benstrong26 said:
In America our economy is really hurting right now, and the idea that we could pretty much open everything back up safely if people wore masks makes it painful that people are putting up so much resistance to the idea.
We could open up the economy right now without any issues. No one is going to do it because there will be hysteria spread by our radical leftist news media.
And of course, the sheep will believe it.